What Jamie Oliver Can Teach Sustainability Activists

Jamie Oliver in a blue and black striped hoodie, smiling at his Food Revolution kitchen bench

Crux has long been a huge fan of British chef Jamie Oliver, not only for inspiring an interest in – and some development of my talent – in cooking, but for his activism and examples of change-making.

His first foray was 2002’s ‘Jamie’s Kitchen’, in which fifteen disadvantaged young people were offered an opportunity in Oliver’s new restaurant, Fifteen, if they successfully completed the training. Five of the original group, all of whom battled problems including homelessness, mental health issues and substance abuse, went on to secure cooking careers, four in top restaurants in London and one who opened his own catering business.

Oliver’s efforts with 2004’s  ‘Jamie’s School Dinners’ to improve school lunches in the UK, 2010’s Emmy Award Winning ‘Food Revolution’ in the US in West Virgina, and a second series of Food Revolution in 2011 in Los Angeles, were intent on changing one of the most personal, and yet also political, of human actions – what people put in their mouths.

Any student of change would do well to watch these series and pay close attention to Oliver’s modus operandi, most likely informed by people skilled in the art and science of persuasion, but also carried by the leadership and interpersonal skills of Oliver himself.

Although the issues Oliver was tackling were reviewed, praised, criticised and commented on widely, there are surprisingly few case studies out there capturing the lessons for application by others.

Yet here we have many of the situations change agents face presented as a story, with real people and situations rather than a list of theoretical concepts, and someone working his way through the pleasures and pains of change, in a familiar and readily digestible format (television).

Oliver’s Food Revolution site includes a section entitled ‘A Case Study For Non-profits On How To Activate The Crowd’ which offers some guidelines on how to animate and engage a community. ‘A Platform for Change’ sets out some concrete steps on specific issues. However the advice still focuses largely on the mechanics for change, for example:

  1. Have a simple message that people grasp.
  2. Have a vivid call to action that is linked to your message – host an event, share your knowledge, inspire better food education.
  3. Allow everyone to get involved. Use all networks at your disposal to establish a community around your cause.
  4. Focus on under 25s – get their attention, their networks are often the most active and connected.
  5. Secure the commitment of like-minded companies, organizations and individuals to unify expertise and support the message.
  6. Get celebrities and influencers to spread the word to increase the reach of your message.
  7. Monitor the conversation, engage with the community and measure your results. This will help you to learn where your campaign is working well, and how it can be developed further.

All absolutely valid and useful pieces of advice. But the most powerful methods of change are not in what we do, but how we do it – how we persuade people to get involved, how we frame our messages, how we get people’s buy-in, how to manage the dynamics of change.

At this deeper level, the lessons from Oliver’s work for change agents include:

He recognised and accepted that those he came into conflict with might fear that their position, status or authority was being questioned or threatened:

Oliver’s first roadblock in both the UK and the US was the school dinner ladies – trained to provide school food with little preparation needed other than reheating; adamant about what students would and would not eat; under pressure and working to feed hundreds of mouths each day – and in walks a young fellow intent on changing it all. To those staff, his presence would have seemed like something was not working well, and by inference, they themselves were doing something wrong. To parents, especially in the UK, he was usurping their authority over their children, even telling them they were not good parents. Maybe he was right in some cases – such as the parents who took to handing fast food through the school fence to keep their kids happy and undermine Oliver’s initiative.

By putting himself in the lunch ladies’ shoes, learning their work role and being on the coalface of change, he showed he was willing to see how things worked from their perspective, and earned their trust – which kept the working relationship intact, even when they didn’t agree on issues.

During the first Food Revolution series in Huntington, West Virginia, Oliver came under attack from a local radio DJ, who voiced the concerns of people worried that Oliver was there to ridicule and stigmatise their home for being the fattest and unhealthiest city in the United States, and then broadcast it around the world in a television series (although the town had been chosen based on government statistics about diet-related illness and death).

By staying the course with the community, involving people and building momentum for the initiative, Oliver turned ‘DJ Rod’ – and his media influence – from the most vocal critic of the Food Revolution to one of it’s most staunch supporters. Oliver worked to morph his adversaries into his allies; rather than wanting to ‘neutralise’ or silence DJ Rod, his mission was to get him involved in and excited about the Food Revolution.

And in the second Food Revolution series, he butted heads with the Los Angeles United School District (LAUSD), who oversee the largest public school system in California. The LAUSD, although they welcomed Oliver’s input to help reinvent menus,  were uncomfortable with the presence of Oliver and his cameras documenting the food systems they were in charge of. The LAUSD were understandably wary of how the school would be portrayed, and did not see eye to eye with Oliver, who considered the series an opportunity for the school to position itself a leader of positive change:

Four hours of TV back home got a billion dollars from the British government, got rubbish in vending machines taken out, got new standards, fresh produce, local food and we’re on the beginning of transition of change.

Jamie Oliver on Oprah, 28 March 2010

Arguably, the LAUSD itself was the cause of the conflict it sought to avoid, creating a drama and a news story around revoking Oliver’s filming permits, and then access to its schools altogether.

By persisting in the face of resistance and being undermined, Oliver was able to influence not only the composition of school menus, but the composition of the LAUSD Board.

He made things visible:

My most vivid memories of the Food Revolution series are the visual elements of the documentaries, Oliver’s stunts:

The absurd comedy of seeing him dressed up as a giant pea pod, running across a schoolyard with a gaggle of squealing kids tearing after him, while he shouts ‘Eat your vegetables!’

Jamie Oliver in a giant green pea pod costume

The visceral horror of seeing him literally dump the amount of fat consumed by the school’s children in one year on a tarpaulin in the school yard (see 1:52 in clip below):

In the second Food Revolution series, Oliver waged war on flavoured milk in schools, demonstrating how much sugar was in a week’s worth of milk consumed at the school by pouring an equivalent amount of sand into a school bus:

Oliver in front of a yellow school bus into which the piles of sugar were poured

Oliver is well aware that these highly visual stunts are the most effective means communication and getting people to internalise a message:

As far as I’m concerned, we just made an incredible documentary with big stunts. Why do we do big stunts? Because a lot of the information we work with is bloody boring. And I don’t expect any public, let alone the Americans, to be remotely interested.

The high impact visuals of these stunts work on two levels – it creates an emotional response in the audience, and it makes great content for being picked up and distributed through mainstream and social media.

On the day of the ‘sugar’ stunt, there were barely two dozen people there. Yet long after the series went to air, the video and images of the stunt are still on the internet, having been picked up by bloggers and other media.

Closely related to making things visible, he made participating in Food Revolution activities a social norm:

In the Food Revolution Kitchen, he posts an image of everyone who has signed up to support the initiative. It shows other people are on board, and helps people to become involved because other people are doing it too:

Jamie in front of his pinboard featuring photos of every participant who has signed up to support the local Food Revolution

That, and another of his stunts, arranging a very public, visible, cooking Flash Mob which got the town talking:

He made things tangible:

To get his message of health and nutrition across to a family featured in the first Food Revolution series, Oliver placed the family’s weekly meals – typically processed foods and fast food – on the kitchen table all at once.

Jamie talks to a mother featured in the Food Revolution series after placing the contents of the family's weekly diet (largely processed food, fried food, pizza etc) on the kitchen table at once

The golden rule of writers is ‘show don’t tell’, and it’s a rule that applies equally to change work. Seeing it, smelling it, realising the scale of it, touching it all affected the person he was engaging with in a much deeper way than simply telling her.

Also in the first Food Revolution series, he took his arch-adversary, DJ Rod, to a local funeral home where the radio announcer was shocked to see the massive sized caskets in which chronically obese people are buried. The turning point for Rod was hearing from the funeral director about conversations he has with grieving families in relation to the burial process for overweight corpses, how the casket has to be transported in the back of a cargo van, how cremation is not an option and the coffin requires two grave spaces. It made the issues Oliver was campaigning on real, immediate in his own community – and the messenger was a local, like himself.

When seeking the support of top local chefs to mentor students, Oliver invited them to lunch – and then served them all a range of foods that comprise a standard public school lunch. The chefs were horrified at the low quality of the food, and agreed to participate.

He understood and empathised with people.

In the second Food Revolution series, he met a single father of two boys, 14 and 10, who were all living on fast food and takeaways, even though the boys did not like the food.

The family wanted to change – but first Oliver had to create an ‘interruption’ to business as usual. He took the family on one of their trips to the drive through, but unbeknown to the family, he had arranged to keep the orders coming, filling their car with the amount of fast food the family eat in a month. But that wasn’t all.

While they were at the drive through, the shows producers entered the family’s house and covered every surface with thousands of dollars worth of fast food amounting to what the father and his sons would eat in a year. The message hit home.

family's house covered in foam containers and bags of fries, hot dogs, pizza, burgers etc

Importantly, Oliver was not just about showing them what they weren’t doing well – he was also there to show them what they could do, and to ensure they had support in the days following his visit so that the change would ‘stick’.

He issued a challenge (ie. made it into a game) – could he guide the boys to cook a chicken and salad in lunch in less time, and more cheaply, than it took their father to go to the drive through, order food and make it home? Yes they could! The boys’ meal came to $23 in ingredients, the takeaway, $31. When their father came home 45 minutes later, Jamie and his sons were throwing a football in the street, lunch already made.

He didn’t judge anyone.

There are all sorts of reasons people make poor food choices, from economic circumstances to lacking skills to not coping in other areas of life or not knowing how to change. Although he pulled no punches in stating what needed to change and why, in being able to listen, to be gentle and to help people realise what they can do, he empowered people he encountered.

He challenged entrenched systems.

No change worth making ever happened without challenging power structures.

In Oliver’s case, the most difficult block he encountered in his school food series was not kids unused to fresh healthy food, not parents unwilling to hear his call for change, not even the formidable school dinner ladies whose work roles would be reinvented, but the Los Angeles United School District (LAUSD). The authority had the power to grant Oliver access to work and film in the schools (or not), and are also in charge of making decisions on suppliers and budgets for school food.

They didn’t want him to film in the school’s cafeteria. With the assistance of school staff who were his allies, a loophole was found that allowed Oliver back into the school to teach or film, but he would not be allowed near the kitchen.

The authorities then revoked permission for all filming on the school grounds. Oliver responded by establishing a shop front, the Food Revolution Kitchen, across the road from the school so that students could still participate after school hours. He showed the students that he was not abandoning the initiative when things got tough.

He held his ground, even when it was difficult – even when it hurt:

I hate making TV documentaries, because it takes quite a lot of energy to know that you’re going to get your arse kicked and people will hate you, or fight you, for large proportions of time.

You know, change is very hard – structures, organisations, businesses, people, anyone really. And if you’re shining a light on one of the most unhealthy places in the world, it has to be a car crash, there’s no pretty way. I knew what I was flying over there for, I knew it would be horrible, but I hadn’t done horrible without my family. When you have shit days you need to be able to go and hug your kids, do you know what I mean? I didn’t have that, and it was hard, really hard.

Oliver remained steadfast to his beliefs and his mission, and withstood the heat he generated that comes with being an instigator of change.

In 2010, Oliver was awarded the TED (Technology, Entertainment, Design) prize for his activism, which offers him a platform to call on the TED community and on influencers to help him fulfil his wish:

I wish for your help to create a strong, sustainable movement to educate every child about food, inspire families to cook again and empower people everywhere to fight obesity.

Here is the TED talk he delivered when receiving his prize:

But for all his public profile, connections, awards, ability to command resources and personable manner, it didn’t equate to making change easier for Jamie Oliver, MBE, celebrity tv chef, author, film maker, businessman – he was in exactly the same position as change agents everywhere find themselves: encountering resistance, facing communication challenges, doing the hard yards.

Jamie Oliver, dressed in pea pod costume, holding fork to mouth of little boy pleading with the reluctant little fellow to eat!

So perhaps his most important lesson on creating change is – never give up!

I reckon I could get in to the head of food service in any Russian cities. I reckon I could get into North Korea inside a week.

That’s Jamie Oliver, in response to being shut out of LA’s public school cafeterias. No change worth making was ever easy.

Who else do can you think of in the public eye, or do you know personally, who is or has been an effective change maker? How were they effective in their work?

What techniques do you use to maintain your spirit in the face of resistance, even hostility?

If you’d like to get Cruxcatalyst via email, click here to subscribe to this blog.

If you liked this post, please consider sharing it using the buttons below.


Pattern Language – Helping Groups Work

group works cards and box

The art of conversation is integral to creating cultural shifts, and so our meetings and gatherings are golden opportunities for transformation.

Yet it is all too common to find that a gathering or meeting is not generating anticipated results – enthusiasm dissipates, discussion gets bogged down, energy levels drop.

The creators of The Group Works Card Deck decided to create a pattern language, a set of ‘design factors’ for bringing life to meetings and other gatherings. This project manifested from their questions:

Why is it that some meetings bring life to your soul, while others leave you wishing you’d never stepped in the room?  What happens at the best ones, that makes them productive, fulfilling, sometimes even magic?

The Deck, a product of the Group Pattern Language Project, was three years in the making, and is the result of input from a team of over 50 people. Created to support group convenors, facilitators and participants in group and process work, the Deck draws on the collective wisdom of the developers, and their knowledge of the most effective events, processes and dynamics they have experienced:

We looked at meetings, conferences, retreats, town halls, and other sessions that give organizations life, solve longstanding dilemmas, get stuck relationships flowing again, deepen understanding, produce clear decisions with wide support, and make a lasting difference.  We also looked at routine, well-run meetings that simply bring people together to get lots of stuff done.  And we made sure to consider what makes such conversations juicy and fun.

This wisdom has been distilled into 91 full-colour cards that ‘…name what skilled facilitators and other participants do to make things work.’

Image Credit (click image for high res version)

Described by its creators as ‘a navigational tool for powerful conversations’, the patterns address a number of themes:

context – understanding and working with the broader context and circumstances both in place and in culture

creativity – using multiple intelligences and a variety of modes to open up creative possibilities

faith – trusting and accepting what happens in a spirit of letting go and letting come; the mystery, synergy, and ineffable, complex magic of emergence; you can invite it, but you can’t control it; felt as a deep sense of connection not only to those assembled and to the work’s purpose but to the larger universe as well

flow – rhythm, energy, and pacing; when we do what, and for how long; things to pay attention to both in anticipating the event and in responding to circumstances in the moment, to support movement along the intended trajectory toward the desired outcome

inquiry & synthesis – discovering coherence and moving toward convergence. From gathering information to exploring knowledge to arriving at understanding, shared meaning, consensus, or clear outcomes

Cards in the Inquiry & Synthesis theme – image credit

intention – serving and attending to the larger purpose for the gathering and how it is manifested, including addressing its longer term meaning and consequence. Why are we here, what’s our shared passion, and what are we aiming to accomplish

modelling – essential skills and responsibilities for both facilitator and participants, to demonstrate good group practice and ensure the process goes well; includes monitoring, nurturing and mentoring the group, enabling their effective personal and collective self-management

perspective – noticing and helping the group more openly and thoughtfully explore different ways of seeing an issue; watching, understanding, and appreciating divergent viewpoints, ideas, values and opinions

Cards in the ‘Perspective’ theme – image credit

relationship – creating and maintaining quality connections with each other, honouring our full selves, and recognising power relations

There are many possible ways in which the cards can be used – the Deck includes a booklet explaining the purpose and history of the project and suggested uses for the cards, as well as inviting feedback on any new approaches from those who use them.

The cards could be useful for:

  • group learning or teaching of facilitation skills
  • post-event reflection and debriefing
  • for intuitive guidance – the cards as oracle
  • assignments during a group session – people are responsible for bringing the pattern on their card into the group as needed
  • methodology mapping – to illustrate how process methods work (eg. Open Space Technology, Appreciative Inquiry, Future Search)
  • during an event or process when the group is ‘stuck’

Aside from its use within and around group work, the Deck also has the potential to act as a framework and learning technique, and can provide a common reference point for practitioners.

The Group Works Card Deck is available for preview, or you can download a free pdf and create your own set, at http://groupworksdeck.org/deck.

You can also purchase the deck as a boxed set, and a smart phone app featuring the whole deck is in development.

To find out about the ongoing development of the pattern language, and explore the patterns in greater detail, go to: http://grouppatternlanguage.org.

For more on patterns, see Anthony Lawlor’s book, 24 Patterns of Wisdom.

Have you ever been to a truly memorable meeting or gathering that transformed you in some way? What was it that created that feeling or outcome?

How do you think you might use this deck in your work?

If you’d like to get Cruxcatalyst via email, click here to subscribe to this blog.

If you liked this post, please consider sharing it using the buttons below.


3 Tips for Effective Sustainability Conversations

Have you ever had a conversation about sustainability and found that people tend to get angry, dismissive, argumentative or go into denial?

Global Footprint Network, whose work involves communicating the often hotly-contentious topic of ecological limits and what this means, developed these guidelines, based on the work of Marshall Rosenberg’s ‘Nonviolent Communication’.

cover of book 'Nonviolent Communication' by Marshall Rosenberg

Why not try these tips for effectively starting and maintaining a conversation on these issues?

#1 – Start A Conversation

Tell the person about your worry and ask for their advice:

  • ‘I wonder what I can do about…what’s your advice?’
  • ‘What would it take for us to…’
  • ‘What makes it so hard to talk about…?


People are honoured to give advice if the question is sincere. Making the issue personal is more genuine and interesting.

Pre-empting fears reduces potential resistance, and breaks the confrontation by making the person you are speaking with part of your team. Focus on the heart – what people are feeling and needing – rather than getting caught up in analyses, diagnoses and judgments.


#2 – Keep Conversation Alive By Avoiding Conversation Stoppers

Avoid Why? which moves people into the defensive. Instead ask ‘can you explain to me how you got to this conclusion?

Avoid No! instead say ‘how does this connect to (your idea)?’

Avoid ‘Yes, but…’ instead use ‘yes, and…’ or say ‘yes I hear you say…and at the same time I observe…’

Never hear judgments, just needs and feelings.


Using ‘why?’, ‘no!’ and ‘yes, but…’ negates, judges and moves the conversation into an inquisition or cross-examination mode. Agreeing or disagreeing brings you back into judgment mode. Reflect back what the person you are speaking to says, so they know they have been heard.


#3 – Keep Conversation Alive By Intensifying Conversation

Enjoy listening: ‘That’s interesting, can you tell me more?’ Ask for examples.

When people challenge you, hear it as an unmet need and answer accordingly.

You can show compassion if you try more to understand than to be understood.


Conversation intensifiers affirm your interest, and encourages and welcomes the contribution of the person with whom you are speaking.

Do you use any of these techniques in your communication approaches? Have they made conversations unfold differently?

To ensure you receive Cruxcatalyst updates, click here to subscribe to this blog and get new articles direct to your inbox.

If you liked this post, please consider sharing it using the buttons below.


Being Aware of Our Belief Grids

dark blue cover of 24 patterns of wisdom book with title in yellow

Self-awareness and empathy are two vitally important aspects of being an effective change agent.

And that’s why a new book just released by architect and philosopher Anthony Lawlor, 24 Patterns of Wisdom: navigating the challenges and awakenings of the human journey (available from Ink Money Press), will be of great value to changemakers.

24 Patterns expresses a range of concepts associated with the human psyche in a beautiful and succinct way, offering a sequence of 24 ‘visual diagrams of knowledge for living’ distilled from wisdom accumulated by humankind over the course of centuries.

These symbols are what the author calls ‘the archetypes of human experience’. Each diagram is explained in both a theoretical sense, and each is also accompanied by a practical example of the concept.

greyscale image of a grid, symbol of how we see the world through our 'grid'

Belief Grid – image (c) Anthony Lawlor, reproduced with permission

The ‘Belief Grid’ is one of the 24 images, and is of particular relevance to those undertaking change work and grappling with diverse value sets:

Between you and the world hovers your Belief Grid. It’s the veil of concepts through which you locate and define people, places and events…

Each of us has a Belief Grid. Our minds are Belief Grid-making machines. Encounters with each other are mostly encounters between our Belief Grids. My framework of concepts I hold to be true crosses paths with your framework of concepts you hold to be true. Instead of connecting human to human, one framework tries to press the other framework into agreeing with it. You can see this everywhere. The stalemates in congress are standoffs between Belief Grids. Clashes between people, organizations and countries are battles between Belief Grids.

In these conflicts, our Belief Grids become solid. They obscure the lives they are trying to serve and protect. When we make our Belief Grids more important than people and the earth, we tyrannize each other and the world. We attempt to suppress life’s revitalizing energy and wisdom and make it rigidly conform to self-centered interests. The result is isolation, depression, struggle and worse. If, on the other hand, we see our Beliefs Grids for what they are—devices our minds create to navigate the world—we can use them as tools for exploring life and fostering communication and understanding.

If we are not self-aware, or aware of and able to acknowledge others’ ‘Belief Grids’ (even if we don’t agree with them), it is all too easy to become bogged in conflict and trying to convince other people that we are right – with the implied inference that they must therefore be wrong. Sometimes even when we are aware of the existence of Belief Grids, in the heat of debate, we can still fall into the trap of forgetting they are there.

Can you recall an occasion when your Belief Grid was impacted? How did you feel, and how did you respond?

How have you ensured your own communication approaches acknowledge/respond to others’ Belief Grids?

To ensure you receive Cruxcatalyst updates, click here to subscribe to this blog and get new articles direct to your inbox.

If you liked this post, please consider sharing it using the buttons below.